Expert Insights from a Delphi-driven Neurologists' Panel: Real-world Mexiletine use in Patients with Myotonic Disorders in Italy.

Background: Myotonic disorders, such as non-dystrophic myotonias (NDMs) and myotonic dystrophies (DMs) are characterized by a delay in muscle relaxation after a contraction stimulus. There is general consensus that protocols to treat myotonia need to be implemented. Objective: Mexiletine is the only pharmacological agent approved for the symptomatic treatment of myotonia in adult patients with NDM and is considered to be the first-line treatment for DMs; however, its production in Italy was halted in 2022 making its availability to patients problematic. Methods: A panel of 8 Italian neurologists took part in a two-round Delphi panel between June and October 2022, analyzing the current use of mexiletine in Italian clinical practice. Results: The panelists assist 1126 patients (69% DM type1, 18% NDM and 13% DM type2). Adult NDM patients receive, on average, 400-600 mg of mexiletine hydrochloride (HCl) while adult DM patients receive 100-600 mg, per day in the long-term. The severity of symptoms is considered the main reason to start mexiletine treatment for both NDM and DM patients. Mexiletine is reckoned to have a clinical impact for both NDM and DM patients, but currently drug access is problematic. Conclusions: Mexiletine treatment is recognized to have a role in the reduction of the symptomatic burden for NDM and DM patients. Patient management could be improved by facilitating access to therapy and developing new drug formulations.

Use of mexiletine in therapy-refractory recurrent ventricular tachycardia storm.

Electrical storm due to recurrent ventricular tachycardias (VTs) is a life-threatening arrhythmic emergency. The authors present a case report of a 69-year-old male patient with VT storm of non-ischemic etiology. Despite optimal medical treatment escalated by amiodarone antiarrhythmic drug therapy, the patient experienced multiple implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks. An electrophysiological study revealed an epicardial substrate; however, considering the patient's extreme obesity and active anticoagulant effect, catheter ablation was deemed to be unfeasible. Subsequently, mexiletine was added to the patient's drug regimen, resulting in successful control of arrhythmias during the following 6 months. Although the most recent European guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias mention mexiletine only for the treatment of LQT3 patients, its use for treatment-refractory VT storm seems to also be an important indication area.

Mexiletine: Antiarrhythmic mechanisms, emerging clinical applications and mortality.

Mexiletine, a class Ib antiarrhythmic drug, exhibits its major antiarrhythmic effect via inhibition of the fast and late Na+ currents in myocardial tissues that are dependent on the opening of Na+ channels for their excitation. Through a comprehensive examination of mexiletine's therapeutic benefits and potential risks, we aim to provide valuable insights that reinforce its role as a vital therapeutic option for patients with ventricular arrhythmias, long QT syndrome, and other heart rhythm disorders. This review will highlight the current understandings of the antiarrhythmic effects and rationales for recent off-label use and address the mortality and proarrhythmic effects of mexiletine utilizing published basic and clinical studies over the past five decades.

Autosomal Recessive Long QT Syndrome: Clinical Aspects and Therapy.

The autosomal recessive (AR) form of Long QT Syndrome (LQTS) is described both associated with deafness known as Jervell and Lange-Nielsen (JLN) syndrome, and without deafness (WD). The aim of the study is to report the characteristics of AR LQTS patients and the efficacy of the therapy. Data of all children with AR LQTS referred to the Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS from September 2012 to September 2021were included. Three (30%) patients had compound heterozygosity and 7 (70%) had homozygous variants of the KCNQ1 gene, the latter showing deafness. Four patients (40%) presented aborted sudden cardiac death (aSCD): three with previous episodes of syncope (75%), the other without previous symptoms (16.6% of asymptomatic patients). An episode of aSCD occurred in 2/3 (66.7%) of WD and heterozygous patients, while in 2/7 (28%) JLN and homozygous patients and in 2/2 patients with QTC > 600 ms. All patients were treated with Nadolol. In 5 Mexiletine was added, shortening QTc and obtaining the disappearance of the T-wave alternance (TWA) in 3/3. Episodes of aSCD seem to be more frequent in LQTS patients with compound heterozygous variants and WD than in those with JLN and homozygous variants. Episodes of aSCD also appear more frequent in children with syncope or with QTc value > 600 ms, even on beta-blocker therapy, than in patients without syncope or with Qtc < 600 ms. However, our descriptive results should be confirmed by larger studies. Moreover, Mexiletine addition reduced QTc value and eliminated TWA.

Indications for mexiletine in the new ESC guidelines and beyond.

INTRODUCTION: Mexiletine is a class IB sodium-channel blocker. Unlike class IA or IC antiarrhythmic drugs, mexiletine rather shortens than prolongs action potential duration; therefore, it is less associated with proarrhythmic effects. AREAS COVERED: Recently, new European Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death were published, including a reappraisal of some established older antiarrhythmic drugs. EXPERT OPINION: Mexiletine offers a first-line, genotype-specific treatment strategy for LQT3 patients as emphasized by the most recent guidelines. Besides this recommendation, current study reports suggest that in therapy-refractory ventricular tachyarrhythmias and electrical storms adjunctive mexiletine treatment may offer the possibility of stabilizing patients with or without concomitant interventional therapy such as catheter ablation.

Transfer of Mexiletine into Breast Milk: A Case Report.

Background: Mexiletine is a class 1B antiarrhythmic agent, used to treat ventricular arrhythmias, and noncardiac-related problems such as myotonia. Limited safety data are available on the transfer of this drug into breast milk. Case Report: We report the case of a woman diagnosed with myotonia congenita who breastfed two children after two consecutive pregnancies. During the breastfeeding of the first and the second infant, she collected, respectively, five and seven samples at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours and 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours after taking 200 mg of mexiletine thrice daily for seven doses. One week after the collection, samples were analyzed with a validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method. No side effect was observed in either child according to the mother. Results: Using the mean milk concentrations, it is estimated that an exclusively breastfed infant would receive a maximum of 5.14% of the initial pediatric mexiletine dosage. We calculated a maximum of 2.67% for the first infant in our case, considering a nonexclusive breastfeeding. Maximal concentrations were observed 1-2 hours after the dose of mexiletine. Results seem to be in accordance with the two cases previously published. Conclusions: Mexiletine transfers into breast milk in low levels. However, results are obtained from only one woman. Therefore, caution should be used when mexiletine is prescribed to breastfeeding women. More cases are needed to evaluate the interindividual variability and to guide women regarding breastfeeding with mexiletine.

Functional characterization and identification of a therapeutic for a novel SCN5A-F1760C variant causing type 3 long QT syndrome refractory to all guideline-directed therapies.

BACKGROUND: Pathogenic variants in the SCN5A-encoded Nav1.5 sodium channel cause type 3 long QT syndrome (LQT3). We present the case of an infant with severe LQT3 who was refractory to multiple pharmacologic therapies as well as bilateral stellate ganglionectomy. The patient's novel variant, p.F1760C-SCN5A, involves a critical residue of the Nav1.5's local anesthetic binding domain. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize functionally the p.F1760C-SCN5A variant using TSA-201 and patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (iPSC-CMs). METHODS: Whole-cell patch clamp was used to assess p.F1760C-SCN5A associated sodium currents with/without lidocaine (Lido), flecainide, and phenytoin (PHT) in TSA-201 cells. p.F1760C-SCN5A and CRISPR-Cas9 variant-corrected isogenic control (IC) iPSC-CMs were generated. FluoVolt voltage dye was used to measure the action potential duration (APD) with/without mexiletine or PHT. RESULTS: V1/2 of inactivation was right-shifted significantly in F1760C cells (-72.2 ± 0.7 mV) compared to wild-type (WT) cells (-86.3 ± 0.9 mV; P <.0001) resulting in a marked increase in window current. F1760C increased sodium late current 2-fold from 0.18% ± 0.04% of peak in WT to 0.49% ± 0.07% of peak in F1760C (P = .0005). Baseline APD to 90% repolarization (APD90) was increased markedly in F1760C iPSC-CMs (601 ± 4 ms) compared to IC iPSC-CMs (423 ± 15 ms; P <.0001). However, 4-hour treatment with 10 µM mexiletine failed to shorten APD90, and treatment with 5µM PHT significantly decreased APD90 of F1760C iPSC-CMs (453 ± 6 ms; P <.0001). CONCLUSION: PHT rescued electrophysiological phenotype and APD of a novel p.F1760C-SCN5A variant. The antiepileptic drug PHT may be an effective alternative therapeutic for the treatment of LQT3, especially for variants that disrupt the Lido/mexiletine binding site.

Blockers of Skeletal Muscle Nav1.4 Channels: From Therapy of Myotonic Syndrome to Molecular Determinants of Pharmacological Action and Back.

The voltage-gated sodium channels represent an important target for drug discovery since a large number of physiological processes are regulated by these channels. In several excitability disorders, including epilepsy, cardiac arrhythmias, chronic pain, and non-dystrophic myotonia, blockers of voltage-gated sodium channels are clinically used. Myotonia is a skeletal muscle condition characterized by the over-excitability of the sarcolemma, resulting in delayed relaxation after contraction and muscle stiffness. The therapeutic management of this disorder relies on mexiletine and other sodium channel blockers, which are not selective for the Nav1.4 skeletal muscle sodium channel isoform. Hence, the importance of deepening the knowledge of molecular requirements for developing more potent and use-dependent drugs acting on Nav1.4. Here, we review the available treatment options for non-dystrophic myotonia and the structure-activity relationship studies performed in our laboratory with a focus on new compounds with potential antimyotonic activity.

Impact of restricted access to, and low awareness of, mexiletine on people with myotonia: a real-world European survey.

Although mexiletine effectively treats myotonia, supply disruptions affected Europe between 2008-2018. MyoPath was a mixed-methods, cross-sectional, market research survey conducted January-June 2018 to evaluate consequences of limited access to/awareness of mexiletine in people with myotonia. Part A: qualitative structured interviews (clinicians; advocates for adult patients); Part B: quantitative online questionnaire completed by people with self-reported history of myotonia. Part A: Interviews (clinicians, n=12; patient advocates, n=5; 12 countries) indicated poor mexiletine awareness among general neurologists. Patients chose between living with myotonia (other treatments were generally unsatisfactory) or importing mexiletine. Part B: Questionnaire respondents, myotonic dystrophy (DM)1, n=213; DM2, n=128; non-dystrophic myotonia (NDM), n=41; other n=8; (11 countries). Of the respondents, 76/390 (20%) people with awareness of/access to mexiletine described profound improvements in myotonia and health-related quality of life following treatment. Respondents with NDM had greatest mexiletine experience (n=28/41). Mexiletine was associated with fewer falls, less muscle stiffness, increased mobility. Treatment interruptions worsened myotonia and were associated with fatigue, pain, dysphagia, breathing difficulty, impaired digestion, poor sleep. However, 36/54 (67%) of currently treated people expressed anxiety about mexiletine's availability: this finding was expected (MyoPath was undertaken before mexiletine's approval in NDM). MyoPath provides the largest European exploration of patients' views regarding impact of mexiletine on myotonia. Anticipated effects of mexiletine differ between people with different myotonic disorders: myotonia is the main symptom in NDM but one of many potential symptoms affecting those with DM. Nevertheless, findings indicate substantial harm caused to people with myotonia when mexiletine awareness/access is limited.

Oral mexiletine for ventricular tachyarrhythmias treatment in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients: a systematic review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of oral mexiletine (oMXT) to treat ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTAs) in the era of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) technology. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases following the PRISMA guidelines to collect literature data reporting oMXT efficacy and safety outcomes in treating VTAs in ICD recipients. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Final analysis included four studies accounting for a total of 91 patients with recurrent VTAs treated with oMXT. Amiodarone therapy was initially attempted in most patients (91.2%), while catheter ablation was performed in one-third of patients. VTA recurrences were observed in 55/91 patients (60.4%) during oMXT treatment compared to 91/91 (100%) before treatment (P<0.001). Appropriate therapies occurred in 55/88 ICD patients (62.5%) during oMXT treatment compared to 80/88 (90.9%) before treatment (P<0.001). After oMXT introduction, there was a significant reduction of the individual burden of VTA episodes and appropriate ICD therapies per patient, showing Hedges'g values of -1.103 (P=0.002) and -1.474 (P=0.008), respectively. Safety analysis showed a sample-weighted overall side-effect rate of 30%, while 21% of patients required drug reduction or discontinuation. Aggregated meta-regression analysis of the included studies and remote literature revealed a linear correlation between oMXT dosage and the overall side effects rate (r2 = 0.48; P=0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Oral mexiletine provides an adjunctive treatment to manage VTAs and reduces appropriate therapies in ICD patients with moderate efficacy and acceptable safety profiles. These observations await confirmation through randomised clinical trials.

Drug repurposing in skeletal muscle ion channelopathies.

Skeletal muscle ion channelopathies are rare genetic diseases mainly characterized by myotonia (muscle stiffness) or periodic paralysis (muscle weakness). Here, we reviewed the available therapeutic options in non-dystrophic myotonias (NDM) and periodic paralyses (PP), which consists essentially in drug repositioning to address stiffness or weakness attacks. Empirical use followed by successful randomized clinical trials eventually led to the orphan drug designation and marketing authorization granting of mexiletine for NDM and dichlorphenamide for PP. Yet, these treatments neither consider the genetic cause of the diseases nor address the individual variability in drug response. Thus, ongoing research aims at the identification of repurposed drugs alternative to mexiletine and dichlorphenamide to allow personalization of treatment. This review highlights how drug repurposing may represent an efficient strategy in rare diseases, allowing reduction of drug development time and costs in a context in which the return on investment may be particularly challenging.

[Impact of late sodium current inhibition on cardiac electrophysiology parameters and ventricular arrhythmias in isolated Langendorff perfused rabbit hearts with short QT interval].

Objective: To determine the electrophysiological effects and related mechanisms of late sodium current inhibitors on hearts with short QT intervals. Methods: The electrophysiological study was performed on isolated Langendorff perfused rabbit hearts. A total of 80 New Zealand White rabbits were used and 34 hearts without drug treatment were defined as control group A, these hearts were then treated with IKATP opener pinacidil, defined as pinacidil group A. Then, 27 hearts from pinacidil group A were selected to receive combined perfusion with sodium channel inhibitors or quinidine, a traditional drug used to treat short QT syndrome, including ranolazine combined group (n=9), mexiletine combined group (n=9), and quinidine combined group (n=9). Nineteen out of the remaining 46 New Zealand rabbits were selected as control group B (no drug treatments, n=19), and then treated with pinacidil, defined as pinacidil group B (n=19). The remaining 27 rabbits were treated with sodium inhibitors or quinidine alone, including ranolazine alone group (n=9), mexiletine alone group (n=9), and quinidine alone group (n=9). Electrocardiogram (ECG) physiological parameters of control group A and pinacidil group A were collected. In control group B and pinacidil group B, programmed electrical stimulation was used to induce ventricular arrhythmias and ECG was collected. ECG physiological parameters and ventricular arrhythmia status of various groups were analyzed. The concentrations of pinacidil, ranolazine, mexiletine and quinidine used in this study were 30, 10, 30 and 1 µmol/L, respectively. Results: Compared with control group A, the QT interval, 90% of the repolarization in epicardial and endocardial monophasic action potential duration (MAPD90-Epi, MAPD90-Endo) was shortened, the transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) was increased, and the effective refractor period (ERP) and post-repolarization refractoriness (PRR) were reduced in pinacidil group A (all P<0.05). Compared with the pinacidil group A, MAPD90-Epi, MAPD90-Endo, QT interval changes were reversed in quinidine combined group and mexiletine combined group (all P<0.05), but not in ranolazine combined group. All these three drugs reversed the pinacidil-induced increases of TDR and the decreases of ERP and PRR. The induced ventricular arrhythmia rate was 0 in control group B, and increased to 10/19 (χ2=13.6, P<0.05) in pinacidil group B during programmed electrical stimulation. Compared with the pinacidil group B, incidences of ventricular arrhythmia decreased to 11% (1/9), 11% (1/9) and 0 (0/9) (χ2=4.5, 4.5, 7.4, P<0.05) respectively in ranolazine group, mexiletine group and quinidine group. Conclusions: Inhibition of late sodium current does not increase but even decreases the risk of malignant arrhythmia in hearts with a shortened QT interval. The antiarrhythmic mechanism might be associated with the reversal of the increase of TDR and the decrease of refractoriness (including both ERP and PRR) of hearts with shortened QT interval.

Mexiletine in spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA) often experience muscular weakness under cold exposure. METHODS: In our previously conducted observational study, we assessed nerve conduction and grip strength to examine the effect of cold exposure on motor function, based on which we conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mexiletine hydrochloride in SBMA (MEXPRESS). RESULTS: In the observational study, 51 consecutive patients with SBMA and 18 healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled. Of the patients with SBMA, 88.0% experienced cold paresis. Patients with SBMA exhibited greater prolongation of ulnar nerve distal latency under cold (SBMA, 5.6 ± 1.1 msec; HC, 4.3 ± 0.6 msec; p <0.001); the change in the distal latencies between room temperature and cold exposure conditions correlated with the change in grip power. In the MEXPRESS trial, 20 participants took mexiletine or lactose, three times a day for 4 weeks with a crossover design. There was no difference in distal latencies at room temperature and under cold exposure between mexiletine and placebo groups as the primary endpoint. However, tongue pressure and 10-sec grip and release test under cold exposure were improved in the mexiletine group. There were no serious adverse events throughout the study period. INTERPRETATION: Cold paresis is common and associated with prolongation of distal latency in SBMA. The results of the phase II clinical trial revealed that mexiletine showed short-term safety, but it did not restore cold exposure-induced prolongation of distal latency.

Muscle velocity recovery cycles as pharmacodynamic biomarker: Effects of mexiletine in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study.

Measuring muscle velocity recovery cycles (MVRCs) is a method to obtain information on muscle cell excitability, independent of neuromuscular transmission. The goal was to validate MVRC as a pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarker for drugs targeting muscle excitability. As proof-of-concept, sensitivity of MVRC to detect effects of mexiletine, a voltage-gated sodium channel (Nav ) blocker, was assessed. In a randomized, double-blind, two-way crossover study, effects of a single pharmacologically active oral dose of 333 mg mexiletine was compared to placebo in 15 healthy male subjects. MVRC was performed predose, and 3- and 5-h postdose using QTrac. Effects of mexiletine versus placebo were calculated using a mixed effects model with baseline as covariate. Mexiletine had significant effects on MVRC when compared to placebo. Early supernormality after five conditioning stimuli was decreased by mexiletine (estimated difference -2.78% [95% confidence interval: -4.16, -1.40]; p value = 0.0003). Moreover, mexiletine decreased the difference in late supernormality after five versus one conditioning stimuli (5XLSN; ED -1.46% [-2.26, -0.65]; p = 0.001). These results indicate that mexiletine decreases the percentage increase in velocity of the muscle fiber action potential after five conditioning stimuli, at long and short interstimulus intervals, which corresponds to a decrease in muscle membrane excitability. This is in line with the pharmacological activity of mexiletine, which leads to use-dependent NaV 1.4 blockade affecting muscle membrane potentials. This study shows that effects of mexiletine can be detected using MVRC in healthy subjects, thereby indicating that MVRC can be used as a tool to demonstrate PD effects of drugs targeting muscle excitability in early phase drug development.

Effects of Mexiletine and Lacosamide on Nerve Excitability in Healthy Subjects: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study.

Selective voltage-gated sodium channel blockers are of growing interest as treatment for pain. For drug development of such compounds, it would be critical to have a biomarker that can be used for proof-of-mechanism. We aimed to evaluate whether drug-induced changes in sodium conductance can be detected in the peripheral nerve excitability profile in 18 healthy subjects. In a randomized, double-blind, 3-way crossover study, effects of single oral doses of 333 mg mexiletine and 300 mg lacosamide were compared with placebo. On each study visit, motor and sensory nerve excitability measurements of the median nerve were performed (predose; and 3 and 6 hours postdose) using Qtrac. Treatment effects were calculated using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with baseline as covariate. Mexiletine and lacosamide had significant effects on multiple motor and sensory nerve excitability variables. Depolarizing threshold electrotonus (TEd40 (40-60 ms)) decreased by mexiletine (estimated difference (ED) -1.37% (95% confidence interval (CI): -2.20, -0.547; P = 0.002) and lacosamide (ED -1.27%, 95% CI: -2.10, -0.443; P = 0.004) in motor nerves. Moreover, mexiletine and lacosamide decreased superexcitability (less negative) in motor nerves (ED 1.74%, 95% CI: 0.615, 2.87; P = 0.004, and ED 1.47%, 95% CI: 0.341, 2.60; P = 0.013, respectively). Strength-duration time constant decreased after lacosamide in motor- (ED -0.0342 ms, 95% CI: -0.0571, -0.0112; P = 0.005) and sensory nerves (ED -0.0778 ms, 95% CI: -0.116, -0.0399; P < 0.001). Mexiletine and lacosamide significantly decrease excitability of motor and sensory nerves, in line with their suggested mechanism of action. Results of this study indicate that nerve excitability threshold tracking can be an effective pharmacodynamic biomarker. The method could be a valuable tool in clinical drug development.

A secondary analysis of PAIN-CONTRoLS: Pain's impact on sleep, fatigue, and activities of daily living.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Peripheral neuropathies commonly affect quality of life of patients due to pain, sleep disturbances, and fatigue, although trials have not adequately explored these domains of care. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of nortriptyline, duloxetine, pregabalin, and mexiletine on pain, sleep, and fatigue in patients diagnosed with cryptogenic sensory polyneuropathy (CSPN). METHODS: We implemented a Bayesian adaptive design to perform a 12-wk multisite, randomized, prospective, open-label comparative effectiveness study in 402 CSPN patients. Participants received either nortriptyline (n = 134), duloxetine (n = 126), pregabalin (n = 73), or mexiletine (n = 69). At prespecified analysis timepoints, secondary outcomes, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) surveys including Short Form (SF)-12, pain interference, fatigue, and sleep disturbance, were collected. RESULTS: Mexiletine had the highest quit rate (58%) due to gastrointestinal side effects, while nortriptyline (38%) and duloxetine (38%) had the lowest quit rates. If tolerated for the full 12 wk of the study, mexiletine had the highest probability (>90%) of positive outcomes for improvements in pain interference and fatigue. There was no significant difference among the medications for sleep disturbance or SF-12 scores. Adverse events and lack of efficacy were the two most common reasons for cessation of therapy. DISCUSSION: Physicians caring for patients with CSPN should consider mexiletine to address pain and fatigue, although nortriptyline and duloxetine are better medications to trial first since they are better tolerated. Future research should compare other commonly used medications for CSPN to determine evidence-based treatment strategies.

Mexiletine effectively prevented refractory Torsades de Pointes and ventricular fibrillation in a patient with congenital type 2 long QT syndrome.

We report a 28-year-old female patient with congenital type 2 long QT syndrome (LQTS) in which mexiletine shortened corrected QT interval (QTc) and effectively prevented refractory Torsade de Pointes (TdP) and ventricular fibrillation (VF). She developed TdP and VF, and was subsequently diagnosed with congenital type 2 LQTS. She had refractory TdP and VF every day despite medical therapy including ß-blocker. They were completely suppressed after the initiation of mexiletine with shorting of QTc interval.

Ten-year-old boy with congenital long QT syndrome type 2 (LQTS2) and life-threatening electrical storm: a case report of successful treatment with mexiletine.

We present a case of a boy with long QT syndrome type 2, who was admitted after an out of hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation. Subsequently, all treatments - intravenous magnesium, optimisation of electrolytes, an isoproterenol infusion - failed to terminate his electrical storm. As a last option before left-sided cardiac sympathetic denervation, mexiletine was started and the electrical storm resolved completely.